Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new interference score for the Stroop test.

Michael D Chafetz1, Lee H Matthews

  • 13520 General DeGaulle Dr. #4098, New Orleans, LA 70114, USA. mikechaf@yahoo.com

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
|May 28, 2004
PubMed
Summary

A novel Stroop test interference calculation method, based on a neuropsychological model, accurately measures word reading suppression. This new method offers improved clinical insights compared to older models, particularly for brain injury and dementia assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuropsychological review of records in forensic cases: An AACN best practices paper with international perspectives.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025
Same author

Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide "evidence" for "good effort".

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2020
Same author

Janet Rogers Matthews (1944-2019).

The American psychologist·2020
Same author

The other face of illness-deception: Diagnostic criteria for factitious disorder with proposed standards for clinical practice and research.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2019
Same author

[Formula: see text]Determination of the smoking gun of intent: significance testing of forced choice results in social security claimants.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2017
Same author

Geomagnetic Orienting in the Radial Eight-Arm Maze?

The Journal of general psychology·2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The Stroop test is a standard measure of selective attention and cognitive control.
  • Existing interference calculation methods may not fully capture the underlying neuropsychological processes.
  • A need exists for a more refined method to assess interference in cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a new interference calculation method for the Stroop test.
  • To base the new method on a neuropsychological model of word reading suppression.
  • To compare the efficacy of the new method against an established (Golden) model.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new interference calculation method derived from a neuropsychological model.
  • Utilizing polynomial regression to analyze the relationship between word reading and interference scores.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of the new method with the Golden model using existing datasets and a sample of demented patients.

    • Main Results:

    • The new method demonstrated a significant relationship between word reading and interference scores, aligning with theoretical predictions.
    • The Golden (Old) model showed only a random relationship, indicating limited predictive validity.
    • The new method provided support for constructs of developmental maturation and lateralized brain damage.
    • A significant reduction in scores was observed with the new method in a sample of demented patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed interference calculation method offers a more accurate and theoretically grounded assessment of Stroop test performance.
    • The new method demonstrates superior validity compared to the Golden model, particularly in assessing cognitive functions related to brain maturation and damage.
    • This new model is recommended for cognitive and neuropsychological comparisons, enhancing clinical inferences for individual patient baselines.