Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
Published on: May 4, 2020
The conflicting standards dilemma and gender: a mediating model of its affective implications and coping styles
1Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada. mstroink@yorku.ca
Abstract:
Women face both traditional and nontraditional standards for gender-appropriate behavior, and society values neither set of standards wholly. In the present study, the author defined this paradox as the Conflicting Standards Dilemma (CSD). Female participants (N = 255) provided descriptions of the levels of femininity and masculinity expected of them by 3 specific others (mother, father, partner) and 3 generalized others (men, women, society), completed a mood questionnaire, and completed a scale assessing 4 proposed coping styles. The results supported the existence of a CSD and partially supported an hypothesized association with negative affect. The author also found support for a mediational model in which coping style mediated the emotional impact of conflicting standards. The results indicated that societal expectations of women are complex and contradictory, and that this situation has a negative impact on women who have not developed adaptive coping styles.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Stereotype Content Model
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Cognitive Dissonance
