Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Morphological processing: a comparison between free and bound stem facilitation.

Matthew J Pastizzo1, Laurie B Feldman

  • 1University at Albany, State University of New York and Haskins Laboratories, Albany, NY 12222, USA. pastizzo@geneseo.edu

Brain and Language
|June 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perception, as you make it.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2017
Same author

Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2015
Same author

With a letter-searched prime, boat primes float but swim and coat don't: further evidence for automatic semantic activation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2008
Same author

What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?

Brain and language·2004
Same author

When orthographic neighbors fail to facilitate.

Brain and language·2004
Same author

Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

The interplay between attentional control and language task schemas: Progressive adaptation of attentional control in interpreting.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

You again? 14-month-olds show neural signatures of lexical-semantic activation for novel instead of familiar voices.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Five-year-old children engage temporal but not frontal mechanisms during morphosyntactic processing of sentences.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that both free and bound word stems facilitate processing of related words. Morphological facilitation for bound stems was linked to the number of related words, suggesting deeper processing for these complex word forms.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Morphological Processing

Background:

  • Linguistics differentiates words based on free stems (e.g., 'act' in 'actor') and bound stems (e.g., 'spect' in 'spectator').
  • Understanding how the brain processes morphologically complex words is crucial for language comprehension theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate morphological facilitation for both free and bound stems in word recognition.
  • To compare the processing of free versus bound stems and their relationship with morphological family size.

Main Methods:

  • A forward masked priming task was employed to measure reaction times.
  • Participants processed prime-target pairs sharing either free or bound stems, compared against baseline conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant morphological facilitation was observed for both free and bound stem pairs.
  • While comparable to an unrelated baseline, free stem facilitation exceeded bound stem facilitation relative to an orthographic baseline.
  • Facilitation for bound stems, unlike free stems, correlated positively with the number of morphological relatives.

Conclusions:

  • Both free and bound stems contribute to morphological facilitation in word recognition.
  • The processing of bound stems may be modulated by the size of their morphological family, indicating sensitivity to lexical structure.