Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sublexical and morphological information in speech processing.

Pienie Zwitserlood1

  • 1University of Münster, Münster, Germany. zwitser@psy.uni-muenster.de

Brain and Language
|June 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cumulative semantic interference is blind to morphological complexity and originates at the conceptual level.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Correction to: Biological sex classification with structural MRI data shows increased misclassification in transgender women.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2021
Same author

On the lexical representation(s) of compounds: A continuous picture naming study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same author

Aging affects steaks more than knives: Evidence that the processing of words related to motor skills is relatively spared in aging.

Brain and language·2021
Same author

Morphological facilitation and semantic interference in compound production: An ERP study.

Cognition·2021
Same author

Biological sex classification with structural MRI data shows increased misclassification in transgender women.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2020
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Speech processing relies on syllable boundaries for quicker word recognition. Morphological structure also aids performance, but syllable cues are prioritized in early speech perception.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Speech Perception
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Understanding how humans process spoken language is crucial for fields like artificial intelligence and speech therapy.
  • The roles of phonological units (syllables) and meaningful word parts (morphemes) in speech perception are actively debated.
  • Previous research has explored lexical access but the interplay between syllabic and morphological information requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of syllabic boundary information on speech processing.
  • To examine the impact of morphological structure on performance in a sequence-monitoring task.
  • To determine the relative importance of syllabic versus morphological cues in spoken word recognition.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three experiments employed a sequence-monitoring task where participants identified phoneme sequences within spoken words.
  • Participants monitored for sequences corresponding to the first syllable, first morpheme, or both.
  • Experiment 3 utilized cross-spliced speech segments to isolate the effects of syllabic and morphological information.

    • Main Results:

    • Syllable boundary cues significantly impacted monitoring latencies across Experiments 1 and 2.
    • A notable effect of morphological match between target sequences and carrier words was observed.
    • In Experiment 3, syllabic boundary information demonstrated precedence over morphological information.

    Conclusions:

    • Syllabic boundary information plays a critical role in early speech processing, facilitating lexical access.
    • Morphological structure contributes to monitoring performance at a later, likely lexical, stage through morphological decomposition.
    • Speech perception integrates information at multiple linguistic levels, with syllabic cues being prioritized early in the process.