Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability and motor memory.

C L Stamm1, J S Kelso

  • 1Motor Behavior Laboratory, The University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|March 1, 1978
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study assessed performance reliability in a positioning task using the generalizability framework. Results indicate that reliability coefficients were higher for algebraic error and that increasing trials did not significantly improve reliability, highlighting challenges in motor-memory research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability estimates for criterion-referenced measures in the psychomotor domain.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1980
Same author

Application of generalizability theory in estimating the reliability of a motor performance test.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1980
Same author

Movement coding and memory in retarded children.

American journal of mental deficiency·1979
Same author

Recognition and recall in slow movements: separate memory states?

Journal of motor behavior·1978
Same author

Effect of environment and order of testing on performance of a motor task.

Research quarterly·1977
Same author

Comparison of two nonparametric methods for estimating the reliability of motor performance tests.

Research quarterly·1977
Same journal

Preferential Cup Size and End-State Comfort in Children.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Psychometrics
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Estimating performance reliability is crucial for understanding motor tasks.
  • The generalizability framework offers a robust method for analyzing variance components and reliability.
  • Short-term motor-memory studies often face challenges with statistical power due to low reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate variance components and reliability of performance in a positioning task.
  • To evaluate the impact of target length and number of trials on reliability.
  • To compare reliability estimates derived from algebraic and absolute error measures.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the generalizability framework to analyze data from 70 subjects.
  • Subjects performed 16 trials at three target lengths (25 cm, 45 cm, 65 cm).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized a subjects x targets x trials repeated measures ANOVA and estimated two reliability coefficients (R and R').

    • Main Results:

    • Both reliability coefficients (R and R') were higher for algebraic error than for absolute error.
    • R' yielded higher reliability estimates than R for both error types.
    • Increasing the number of trials from 2 to 16 did not substantially alter reliability coefficients.

    Conclusions:

    • The generalizability framework provides valuable insights into performance reliability in motor tasks.
    • Low reliability, particularly for absolute error, can complicate the interpretation of motor-memory studies.
    • Findings underscore the need to consider reliability when designing and interpreting studies on short-term motor memory.