[Clinical significance of the assessment of endothelial function]

Endothelium-derived nitric oxide is not only a potent vasodilator but also inhibits platelet aggregation, vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation, monocyte adhesion and adhesion molecule expression, thus protecting the vessel wall from the development of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Major cardiovascular risk factors are associated with endothelial dysfunction, which involves enhanced production of oxygen free radicals, that can destroy nitric oxide and reduce its availability, and release of endothelium-derived contracting factors including prostanoids and endothelin-1. Endothelial dysfunction is a promoter of atherosclerotic and thrombotic damage and in prospective studies on patients with high cardiovascular risk impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. However, endothelial function cannot yet be included among the surrogate endpoints which need to be measured for cardiovascular risk stratification. This limitation springs from the fact that available tests to assess endothelium-dependent vasodilation are invasive or, if noninvasive, they have no sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be proposed for clinical practice. Moreover, no study is available demonstrating that reversal of endothelial dysfunction, which can be obtained by appropriate treatment, is independently associated with a better clinical outcome. However it is conceivable that in the future, by the utilization of a non-invasive method such as the determination of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, large-scale multicenter trials might provide a definitive answer to the real prognostic value of endothelial dysfunction, in terms of cardiovascular risk and therapeutic approach.