Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of electron beam characteristics from multiple accelerators.

David S Followill1, Denise S Davis, Geoffrey S Ibbott

  • 1Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA. dfollowi@mdanderson.org

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|June 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Manufacturer nominal electron energy is unreliable for electron beam treatment planning. Depth dose characteristics like d(max), d(80), and d(50) vary significantly, necessitating the use of specific beam data for accurate dosimetry and quality assurance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Brachytherapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Brachytherapy Alone for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0232 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2023
Same author

AAPM Task Group Report 306: Quality control and assurance for tomotherapy: An update to Task Group Report 148.

Medical physics·2022
Same author

Medical physicist certification and training program accreditation.

Health and technology·2022
Same author

Body region-specific 3D age-scaling functions for scaling whole-body computed tomography anatomy for pediatric late effects studies.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2021
Same author

Photon beam modeling variations predict errors in IMRT dosimetry audits.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2021
Same author

Practice Patterns of Pediatric Total Body Irradiation Techniques: A Children's Oncology Group Survey.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Dosimetry

Background:

  • Accurate electron beam dosimetry is crucial for effective radiation therapy.
  • Electron beam treatment planning relies on precise depth dose characteristics.
  • Variability in beam quality necessitates careful characterization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correlate electron beam depth dose characteristics (d(max), d(80), d(50)) with nominal energy.
  • To evaluate the suitability of nominal energy for treatment planning and quality assurance.
  • To identify discrepancies in electron beam characterization across different linear accelerators.

Main Methods:

  • Measured depth dose characteristics for over 2000 electron beams from Varian, Siemens, and Elekta/Philips accelerators.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Covered nominal electron beam energies from 4-22 MeV.
  • Data collected at nominal source-to-skin distance using AAPM TG-25 recommendations.

    • Main Results:

    • Depth dose parameters (d(max), d(80), d(50)) correlated predictably with the R(50) beam quality indicator.
    • Significant overlap in d(80) and d(50) when plotted against nominal energy.
    • Depth dose values varied by up to 20 mm for high energies at a given nominal energy.

    Conclusions:

    • Nominal electron beam energy is an inadequate descriptor for treatment planning.
    • Clinicians and physicists must use specific, measured depth dose data for clinical beams.
    • Relying on nominal energy can lead to significant inaccuracies in electron beam dosimetry.