Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Minimal Invasive Surgical Procedure of Inducing Myocardial Infarction in Mice
Published on: May 4, 2015
Surgical treatment of acute myocardial infarction
Ettore Vitali1, Tiziano Colombo, Andrea Garatti
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, A. De Gasperis Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy. ettorevitali@tin.it
Insights
Emergency surgical revascularization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) offers a valid therapeutic option. Despite high periprocedural risks, especially in cardiogenic shock cases, patients experience satisfactory long-term survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment
Background:
- Surgical revascularization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has evolved significantly due to improved intraoperative management and myocardial protection techniques.
- This study analyzes the long-term outcomes of emergency myocardial surgical revascularization for AMI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term results of emergency surgical revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
- To assess the efficacy and survival rates of this intervention, particularly in complicated cases.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 237 patients (85.3% males, mean age 59.6 years) underwent emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for severe AMI between 1986 and 2003.
- Preoperative complications included cardiogenic shock (34.6%), pulmonary edema, mechanical ventilation, and cardiac arrest. Mean time from symptom onset to surgery was 9.4 hours.
Main Results:
- Overall hospital mortality was 21.1% (50 deaths). Mortality was higher in patients with major preoperative complications (36.2%) and cardiogenic shock (40.2%).
- Survival rates for discharged patients were 97.8% at 1 year and 79.6% at 5 years. For cardiogenic shock patients, survival was 98.8% at 1 year and 81.2% at 5 years.
- Ejection fraction improved significantly from 37.2% preoperatively to 44.0% pre-discharge (p=0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Emergency surgical revascularization for AMI, even with cardiogenic shock, is a viable treatment option.
- While associated with high periprocedural risk, it yields satisfactory late survival.
- Improved risk assessment, surgical techniques, and circulatory support can further enhance outcomes.
Background:
The role of surgical revascularization in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed considerably over the last 30 years along with improvement in intraoperative management and techniques of myocardial protection. The aim of this work was to analyze the long-term results of our experience of emergency myocardial surgical revascularization for AMI.
Methods:
Between January 1986 and October 2003, 237 patients (85.3% males; mean age 59.6 +/- 9.6 years) underwent emergency coronary artery bypass graft for severe AMI. At admission 82 patients (34.6%) were in cardiogenic shock, while 124 patients (52.3%) presented major preoperative complications (acute pulmonary edema, mechanical ventilation, intra-aortic counterpulsation, cardiac arrest). Preoperative intra-aortic counterpulsation was performed in 125 patients (52.7%). The mean time interval between symptom onset and surgery was 9.4 hours. Three-vessel disease was detected in 107 patients (45%), with main left stenosis in 12.9%.
Results:
There were overall 50 hospital deaths (21.1%). Amongst patients with major preoperative complications, mortality was 36.2% (45 cases out of 124); mortality for cardiogenic shock was 40.2% (33 patients out of 82). Survival of the first 140 patients undergoing operation and then discharged was 97.8% at 1 year and 79.6% at 5 years. The survival rate of the first 60 patients in cardiogenic shock operated on and then discharged is 98.8% at 1 year and 81.2% at 5 years. The ejection fraction in 102 echocardiographically controlled patients was 37.2 +/- 8.5% preoperatively and 44.0 +/- 10.1% at pre-discharge (p = 0.0001).
Conclusions:
Surgical revascularization for AMI, especially if complicated by cardiogenic shock, is a valid therapeutic option that carries a high periprocedural risk but that is balanced by a satisfactory late survival. A more precise patient's risk assessment at admission, improvement of surgical and myocardial protection techniques, extensive use of intra-aortic counterpulsation, and new circulatory support when needed, can improve outcomes and late survival.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management

