Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Questionable accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003.

Jacqui Tong1

  • 1Programmes Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières UK, 3rd Floor, 67-74 Saffron Hill, London EC1N 8QX, UK. jacqui.TONG@london.msf.org

Disasters
|June 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delivering care in extreme conditions. Interview by Victoria Hoban.

Nursing times·2004
See all related articles

This study analyzes Médecins Sans Frontières' (MSF) relationship with the Sphere Project, exploring reasons for MSF

Area of Science:

  • Humanitarian Action and Organizational Dynamics

Background:

  • Examines the complex relationship between Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and the Sphere Project, a key initiative in humanitarian standards.
  • Investigates the underlying factors contributing to differences between non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and specific organizational philosophies, using MSF as a case study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify key elements of MSF-style humanitarianism and understand why MSF initially chose not to fully embrace the Sphere Project.
  • To critically analyze MSF's original concerns and arguments against Sphere participation, evaluating them against subsequent experiences.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of organizational factors influencing NGO collaboration and divergence.
  • Review of MSF's historical stance and arguments regarding the Sphere Project.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical discussion and counter-criticism based on post-inception experiences of the Sphere Project.

    • Main Results:

    • Identifies specific reasons for MSF's reluctance to fully engage with the Sphere Project, rooted in its distinct humanitarian approach.
    • Presents a critical examination of MSF's initial concerns, offering counter-arguments informed by Sphere's operational history.
    • Highlights evolving perceptions of Sphere and accountability within MSF by 2003.

    Conclusions:

    • MSF's non-participation stemmed from fundamental differences in humanitarian philosophy and operational priorities compared to Sphere's standardization approach.
    • The article provides insights into the ongoing dialogue between operational humanitarianism and standardized accountability frameworks.
    • MSF's stance in 2003 reflects a nuanced perspective on Sphere's role and the broader implications for humanitarian accountability.