Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The genetic difference principle.

Colin Farrelly¹

¹University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB

|June 10, 2004

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Wisdom-inquiry science is essential for healthy longevity.

Age and ageing·2025

Same author

Climate geroscience: the case for 'wisdom-inquiry' science.

Biology letters·2024

Same author

The role of science communication in advancing translational gerontology.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2024

Same author

Navigating the Landscape of Translational Geroscience in Canada: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Current Progress and Future Directions.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2024

Same author

Imagination and idealism after the COVID-19 pandemic: the science of healthy ageing.

Royal Society open science·2024

Same author

"Post-Protean" Public Health and the Geroscience Hypothesis.

Aging and disease·2023

Same journal

Defending the Ethical Permissibility of Laryngeal Transplantation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

Should Adherence to Medical Recommendations Be a Requirement for Kidney Transplant Candidacy?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

Carrots and Sticks: Incentives in Shaping Digital Health Products.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

From Empowerment to Offloading: Task Shifting and the Redistribution of Responsibility in Digital Health.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

See all related articles

This study evaluates genetic justice principles, finding the genetic difference principle most effective for fair healthcare distribution. A modified version prioritizes the least advantaged, offering practical guidance for resource-limited societies.

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Genetics
Social Justice

Background:

Emerging debates on genetics and justice.
Three principles for genetic interventions: genetic equality, genetic decent minimum, and genetic difference principle.

Purpose of the Study:

Examine the rationale of each genetic justice principle.
Critique genetic equality and genetic decent minimum for currency and weight problems.
Develop the genetic difference principle for just healthcare and distributive justice.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of ethical principles.
Argumentation regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each principle.
Development and adaptation of the genetic difference principle.

Keywords:

Analytical Approach Genetics and Reproduction Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Genetic equality and genetic decent minimum are ill-equipped to address key challenges.
The genetic difference principle shows the most promise.
A lax interpretation of the genetic difference principle is proposed.

Conclusions:

The proposed interpretation of the genetic difference principle benefits the least advantaged.
This approach aligns with prioritarianism.
Provides practical guidance for non-ideal societies with limited resources.