Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized trials for selective site pacing: do we know where we are going?

Michael D Gammage1, Anna-Marie Marsh

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham and University Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. m.d.gammage@bham.ac.uk

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|June 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Pacing from traditional heart sites may harm left ventricular function and promote arrhythmias. This review examines randomized studies on alternate pacing sites to improve outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Challenges of Classifying Stage B Heart Failure in a High-Risk Population.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2026
Same author

Inter-technique agreement of left atrial and ventricular deformation analysis: a comparison between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Echo research and practice·2025
Same author

Cardiovascular MRI Feature-Tracking Strain Rate for Assessment of Diastolic Function.

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging·2025
Same author

Association between subclinical right ventricular alterations and aerobic exercise capacity in type 2 diabetes.

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance·2024
Same author

Is atrial fibrillation in HFpEF a distinct phenotype? Insights from multiparametric MRI and circulating biomarkers.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2024
Same author

Impact of the Remission of Type 2 Diabetes on Cardiovascular Structure and Function, Exercise Capacity and Risk Profile: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2023

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Traditional right-sided pacing (right ventricular apex, right atrial appendage) is linked to adverse long-term effects on left ventricular function and increased atrial arrhythmias.
  • Numerous small studies, including randomized trials, have investigated alternative pacing sites.
  • Heterogeneity in study designs, pacing site definitions, and data duration (acute vs. long-term) hinder direct comparison of findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and analyze existing randomized studies evaluating the impact of different cardiac pacing sites.
  • To compare the effects of traditional pacing locations versus alternative right-sided sites on cardiac function and arrhythmias.
  • To identify knowledge gaps and inform the design of future research on optimal pacing strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials comparing different cardiac pacing sites.
  • Analysis of study designs, patient populations, pacing parameters, and reported outcomes (left ventricular function, atrial arrhythmias).
  • Assessment of data quality, focusing on studies with longer-term follow-up and clear site definitions.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests potential long-term detriment associated with conventional right ventricular apex and right atrial appendage pacing.
  • Some studies indicate that alternative pacing sites may offer benefits regarding ventricular function and arrhythmia burden, though data is often limited or inconsistent.
  • Variability in study methodology complicates definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of any specific pacing strategy.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence highlights potential risks of traditional right-sided cardiac pacing.
  • Further well-designed, long-term randomized studies are crucial to determine the optimal pacing site for minimizing adverse effects and improving patient outcomes.
  • Standardization of pacing site definitions and outcome reporting is needed for future research.