Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or playing an...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
Modeling in Therapy01:26

Modeling in Therapy

Modeling, a key technique in therapy, uses observational learning to help clients acquire and practice new skills by watching therapists demonstrate desired behaviors. This approach, rooted in Albert Bandura's concept of vicarious learning, plays a significant role in therapeutic interventions for various psychological conditions, including social anxiety, ADHD, and depression.
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
Modeling with Differential Equations01:25

Modeling with Differential Equations

Population dynamics can be described mathematically by considering the population size P(t) as a function of time. The rate of change of the population is then represented by the derivative of P(t). A simple assumption is that the rate of growth is proportional to the size of the population itself. This leads to an exponential growth model, where the population increases rapidly without bound. While this is a useful first approximation, it does not reflect realistic long-term...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing experimental design through Bayes factor design analysis: insights from multi-armed bandit tasks.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

Model-based and model-free valuation signals in the human brain vary markedly in relation to individual differences in behavioral control.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Individual Brain Charting: fifth release of high-resolution fMRI data for cognitive mapping.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Why sleep matters in chronic pain: evidence across the lifespan.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

The representation and valuation of subgoals in the human brain during model-based hierarchical behavior.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Tonic pain modulates neural correlates of associative phasic pain memories.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Keep the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes alive - the science is worth the price tag.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Say hello to hard helium.

Nature·2026
Same journal

How to avoid dementia - what the science really says.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Save Hubble: the race to preserve the space telescope kicks off.

Nature·2026
Same journal

How long can humans live? All evidence points to a maximum of 125 years.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Listen to Gen Z when it comes to AI in education.

Nature·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans.

Ben Seymour1, John P O'Doherty, Peter Dayan

  • 1Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. bseymour@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Nature
|June 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans learn to predict pain using environmental cues through a process similar to temporal difference learning. Neural activity in the ventral striatum and anterior insula supports this flexible aversive learning.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Psychiatry
  • Learning and Memory

Background:

  • Predicting environmental harm is crucial for survival.
  • Pavlovian conditioning and temporal difference learning models explain sequential prediction but lack neurobiological grounding.
  • Understanding the neural basis of aversive learning is essential for managing real-world threats.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying higher-order aversive conditioning in humans.
  • To identify the computational strategies humans employ to learn predictions about pain.
  • To explore the role of specific brain regions in processing sequential aversive learning.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to study higher-order aversive conditioning.
  • Participants underwent a conditioning paradigm to assess learning of sequential predictors of pain.
  • Neural activity was analyzed for correspondence with temporal difference learning signals.

Main Results:

  • Neural activity in the ventral striatum and anterior insula significantly correlated with temporal difference learning predictions.
  • The findings demonstrate a neural basis for sequential learning of aversive predictions.
  • This learning process is flexible and adaptable to uncertain environments.

Conclusions:

  • The ventral striatum and anterior insula play a key role in learning sequential predictions for aversive events.
  • This study provides a neurobiological account for a flexible aversive learning process.
  • The ventral striatum may integrate both appetitive and aversive predictions to guide behavior.