Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia.

D W Brock1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Voluntary euthanasia, or physician-assisted dying, is supported by principles of self-determination. Despite ethical concerns, legalizing euthanasia respects patient autonomy and alleviates suffering, aligning with professional commitment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences emerge in visceral adipose tissue accumulation after selection for innate cardiovascular fitness.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2010
Same author

Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles.

Journal of medical ethics·2006
Same author

Equity in liver allocation.

Medical ethics (Burlington, Mass.)·2004
Same author

Some questions about the moral responsibilities of drug companies in developing countries.

Developing world bioethics·2003
Same author

Misconceived sources of opposition to physician-assisted suicide.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003
Same author

Genetics and confidentiality.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2002

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • End-of-Life Care

Background:

  • The debate surrounding voluntary euthanasia involves complex ethical considerations.
  • Principles of self-determination and individual well-being are central to the discussion.
  • Existing moral and professional objections influence perspectives on euthanasia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ethical arguments for and against voluntary euthanasia.
  • To assess the potential consequences of legalizing euthanasia.
  • To determine the compatibility of physician-assisted dying with professional medical commitments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ethical principles supporting patient autonomy and well-being.
  • Examination of arguments concerning the inherent morality of euthanasia.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachDeath and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of potential positive and negative societal and medical consequences.

    • Main Results:

    • Legalizing euthanasia respects patient autonomy and can relieve prolonged suffering.
    • Concerns include undermining medical ethics, reducing care for the dying, and the 'slippery slope' argument.
    • The practice of voluntary euthanasia is deemed compatible with a physician's professional commitment.

    Conclusions:

    • The principles of self-determination and well-being support voluntary euthanasia.
    • Despite potential negative consequences, the benefits of respecting patient autonomy and relieving suffering are significant.
    • Physician-assisted dying can be ethically permissible and compatible with medical professionalism.