Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantification of biological variability.

P O Droz1

  • 1Institute for Occupational Health Sciences, Lausanne University, Switzerland.

The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of occupational exposure: comparison of biological and environmental variabilities using physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2012
Same author

Impact of biological and environmental variabilities on biological monitoring--an approach using toxicokinetic models.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2010
Same author

Multimodel inference and multimodel averaging in empirical modeling of occupational exposure levels.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2009
Same author

Comparison of indices proposed as criteria for assigning skin notation.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2008
Same author

Effects of bioaerosol exposure on work-related symptoms among Swiss sawmill workers.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2007
Same author

[Risk management in the hospital milieu: needs and implications].

Revue medicale de la Suisse romande·2002
Same journal

Response to Article by Prof. Hans Kromhout, Hygiene Without Numbers.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

Development of an Interception Glove Sampler for Skin Exposures to Aromatic Isocyanates.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

When Are Risk Analyses on Job Titles Informative?

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

Differential Counting of Asbestos Using Phase Contrast and Fluorescence Microscopy.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 1-Particle Size Selection Performance.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
See all related articles

This study explores simulating variability in occupational pharmacokinetics. It compares a simple one-compartment model with a complex physiologically based model to better estimate worker exposure and understand biological monitoring data variability.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Pharmacokinetic (PK) models typically describe chemical compound behavior in average human bodies.
  • Variability in PK parameters is crucial for understanding individual exposure, especially in biological monitoring.
  • Relating air and biological measures requires accounting for individual biological data variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare two approaches for simulating variability in occupational pharmacokinetics.
  • To assess the utility of simple and physiologically based models in predicting pharmacokinetic responses in diverse worker groups.
  • To inform the estimation of worker exposure and the interpretation of biological monitoring data.

Main Methods:

  • A simple one-compartment PK model utilizing statistical distributions for compound intake and elimination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A seven-compartment physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model incorporating statistical distributions for exposure and physiological parameters (e.g., workload, body size, organ function).
  • Application of realistic statistical distributions to simulate biological monitoring variability.

    • Main Results:

    • The simple model was applied to compare air and biological monitoring for worker exposure estimation.
    • The PBPK model enables prediction of PK responses in groups of workers with varying exposures and physiological characteristics.
    • Both models, when using realistic distributions, can describe biological monitoring variability in occupational settings.

    Conclusions:

    • Both simple and physiologically based pharmacokinetic models offer valuable approaches for simulating and understanding variability in occupational settings.
    • The choice of model depends on the specific needs for predicting and understanding pharmacokinetic variability in worker populations.
    • Further developments in these modeling approaches can enhance occupational exposure assessment and risk management.