Related Experiment Videos
Technical considerations regarding the short (dit)-long (dah) key press paradigm.
1Department of Psychology, California State University, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Journal of Motor Behavior
|March 1, 1981
Summary
The relationship between reaction time and response duration is unreliable. This study found the effect is not consistently replicated, especially with specific knowledge of results, suggesting caution in interpreting past findings.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Motor Control
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- Previous research suggested a correlation between longer reaction times and longer response durations.
- This finding, however, faced replication challenges in subsequent statistically robust studies.
- The reliability of this effect under varying experimental conditions remained uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the replicability of the reaction time-response duration relationship.
- To examine the influence of different knowledge of results (KR) arrangements on this effect.
- To determine the conditions under which the long-short effect is reliable.
Main Methods:
- An experiment was designed to test the effect using knowledge of results (KR) similar to previous studies.
- The experiment also included variations in KR arrangements to assess sensitivity.
- Statistical analysis was employed to evaluate the reliability of observed effects.
Main Results:
- The study failed to replicate the long-short effect when KR conditions matched Kerr (1979).
- A reliable long-short effect was observed, however, under different KR arrangements.
- This indicates a significant, unexpected sensitivity to the type of KR provided.
Conclusions:
- The previously reported relationship between reaction time and response duration is not consistently reliable.
- The effect's presence or absence is highly dependent on the specific knowledge of results used.
- Findings necessitate caution when interpreting prior research utilizing this experimental paradigm.