Related Experiment Videos
Say it with me: stuttering inhibited.
Tim Saltuklaroglu1, Vikram N Dayalu, Joseph Kalinowski
1Stuttering Research Lab, Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
|June 19, 2004
Summary
Watching a speaker silently mouth words significantly reduces stuttering in people who stutter. This fluency enhancement is greatest when the visual speech matches the intended words, suggesting a link between speech gestures and stuttering reduction.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Stuttering is a complex speech disorder affecting fluency.
- External speech cues can modulate speech production.
- Visual speech, or lip movements, provides articulatory information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of silently mouthed visual speech on fluency in adults who stutter.
- To compare the impact of linguistically equivalent versus linguistically different visual speech.
Main Methods:
- Ten adults who stutter participated in the study.
- Participants recited memorized text under three conditions: no visual speech, linguistically equivalent visual speech, and linguistically different visual speech.
- Stuttering frequency was measured and compared across conditions.
Main Results:
- A 71% reduction in stuttering was observed when participants watched linguistically equivalent visual speech.
- A 35% reduction in stuttering was observed with linguistically different visual speech, compared to no visual speech.
- Visual speech significantly enhanced fluency, with greater effects for linguistically equivalent stimuli.
Conclusions:
- Silently mouthed visual speech can substantially enhance fluency in people who stutter.
- The degree of linguistic equivalence between the visual speech and the intended utterance is crucial for optimal stuttering inhibition.
- Fluency enhancement may occur by complementing the speaker's speech gestures, compensating for internal speech production inconsistencies.