Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Incidental processing of biological motion.

Ian M Thornton1, Quoc C Vuong

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. ian.thornton@tuebingen.mpg.de

Current Biology : CB
|June 19, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Detecting biological motion is vital for survival. Even irrelevant "to-be-ignored" walkers influence behavior, showing complex dynamic patterns are processed incidentally, impacting cognitive models.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dose-dependent dorsal column activation drives analgesic effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026
Same author

The bookend effect.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Epidural Spinal Signals in Preclinical Models of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same author

Electrophysiological Characteristics of Epidural Spinal Signals in Preclinical Models of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Mainz-Linez Illusion.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

Interoception in migraine is characterised by normal accuracy but altered sensibility and behaviour.

Scientific reports·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computer vision

Background:

  • Humans efficiently extract information from biological motion displays.
  • Biological motion processing is often considered automatic.
  • Previous research lacked direct behavioral evidence for automaticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether task-irrelevant biological motion is processed incidentally.
  • To provide direct behavioral evidence for automatic biological motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a flanker paradigm with central and peripheral walker stimuli.
  • Assessed the influence of "to-be-ignored" peripheral walkers on central target processing.

Main Results:

  • Peripheral, task-irrelevant walkers significantly influenced the processing of the central target.
  • Behavioral data indicate that dynamic figures cannot be fully ignored.

Conclusions:

  • Complex dynamic patterns, like biological motion, are processed incidentally.
  • Findings challenge assumptions of fully automatic processing and inform models of perception.

Related Experiment Videos