Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
[Thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarct]
1Zavod za bolesti srca i krvnih zila, Interna klinika Medicinskog fakulteta u Zagrebu, Klinicka bolnica Dubrava, Avenija Gojka Suska 6 10000 Zagreb, Hrvatska.
Insights
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is more effective than thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Meta-analysis shows pPCI reduces short-term death and reinfarction rates in acute myocardial infarction patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Context:
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires timely reperfusion therapy.
- Treatment options include thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
Purpose:
- To compare the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) versus thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Summary:
- A meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials (7739 patients) demonstrated superior outcomes with pPCI.
- pPCI significantly reduced short-term death (7% vs 9%), non-fatal reinfarction (2.5% vs 6.8%), death excluding cardiogenic shock (5% vs 7%), and a combined endpoint including death, reinfarction, and stroke (8% vs 14%).
- These benefits were observed irrespective of thrombolytic agent or reperfusion delay for PCI transfer.
Impact:
- Primary PCI is the more effective treatment strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
- This finding supports the widespread adoption of pPCI in STEMI management.
Abstract:
Reperfusion therapy in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction includes thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (pPTCA) or primary coronary intervention (pPCI). Many clinical trials have been done to compare the efficacy of treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction with thrombolytic therapy vs. primary coronary angioplasty. A meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials including 7739 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showed better results with pPCI in reducing overall short-term death (7% vs. 9%, p = 0.0002), non-fatal reinfarction (2.5% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.0001), death excluding cardiogenic shock (5% vs. 7, p = 0.0003) and combined endpoint of death, non-fatal reinfarction and stroke (8% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). Primary PCI was better than thrombolytic therapy irrespective of the type of thrombolytic agent used even then when reperfusion was delayed because of patient transfer to a corresponding teriary center for primary PCI. Primary PCI is more effective than thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of ST-segment elevation AMI.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management