Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling judgments of linear extent.

Ernest Greene1, William Frawley

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Neuropsychology Foundation, Los Angeles 90089-1061, USA. egreene@usc.edu

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|June 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Human spatial judgment errors in estimating line spans, ranging from 0.5 to 8 degrees, show complex patterns of under- and overestimation. These visual perception errors may stem from neural receptive field interactions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anomalous contrast as an adaptive violation of the Talbot-Plateau law.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Balance and imbalance in dark and bright (OFF and ON) visual channels.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Anomalous recognition of flicker-fused letters.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Evaluating integration of letter fragments through contrast and spatially targeted masking.

Journal of vision·2024
Same author

Human perception of flicker-fused letters that are luminance balanced.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Evaluating the Talbot-Plateau law.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Accurate spatial perception is crucial for many cognitive functions.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing linear extent judgments, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model and understand the systematic errors in human judgments of linear extent.
  • To investigate the relationship between judgment errors and the physical properties of the visual stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects judged linear extents (0.5-8 degrees visual angle) by assessing and reproducing dot spans.
  • Judgment errors were statistically modeled using linear and Fourier components for each subject and session.

Main Results:

  • Most models revealed complex patterns of underestimates and overestimates that varied with the judged span.
  • Quasiperiodic oscillations, indicating successive under- and overestimations, were observed in some individual models.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial position encoding may involve mosaic-organized neuron receptive fields.
  • Observed judgment errors could reflect imperfections or competitive interactions within these neural receptive fields.

Related Experiment Videos