A test for informative censoring in clustered survival data
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Xuelin Huang1, Robert A Wolfe, Chengcheng Hu
1Department of Biostatistics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston 77030, USA. xlhuang@mdanderson.org
Abstract:
Frailty models are frequently used to analyse clustered survival data. The assumption of non-informative censoring is commonly used by these models, even though it may not be true in many situations. This article proposes a test for this assumption. It uses the estimated correlation between two types of martingale residuals, one from a model for failure and the other from a model for censoring. It distinguishes two types of censoring, namely withdrawal and the end of the study. Simulation studies show that the proposed test works well under various scenarios. For illustration, the test is applied to a data set for kidney disease patients from multiple dialysis centres.
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Censoring Survival Data
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...

