Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodologic implications of the Precautionary Principle: causal criteria.

Douglas L Weed1

  • 1Office of Preventive Oncology, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. dw102i@nih.gov

International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
|June 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The Precautionary Principle in public health needs new methods for determining disease causation. This study examines how to set minimum evidence standards for taking preventive action when causality is not fully established.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global matters of epidemiology and the ethical challenges of addressing the health of populations.

Annals of epidemiology·2024
Same author

A metaphor for epidemiology: The sea of person time.

Global epidemiology·2023
Same author

Commentary: On the reliability of causal claims.

Global epidemiology·2023
Same author

Do Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors? Another Piece of the Puzzle.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2022
Same author

Does paraquat cause Parkinson's disease? A review of reviews.

Neurotoxicology·2021
Same author

The Need for Systematic Reviews in Oncology.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2018

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Current public health practice relies on established causal criteria for disease causation.
  • The Precautionary Principle advocates for preventive action even with incomplete scientific evidence of causality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate methods of causal inference for applying the Precautionary Principle in public health.
  • To determine the evidentiary conditions required for precautionary preventive action.
  • To articulate minimum evidentiary requirements for causation in public health practice.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing causal criteria used in epidemiology and scientific evidence.
  • Examination of two precautionary changes to criteria-based causal inference: reducing criteria number and weakening inference rules.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion on the implications of these changes for establishing minimum evidentiary conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • The study identifies a need to define specific evidentiary conditions for precautionary action under the Precautionary Principle.
    • Proposed modifications to causal inference methods include reducing criteria and weakening inference rules.
    • These modifications suggest a path toward identifying minimum evidentiary conditions but require further validation.

    Conclusions:

    • Incorporating the Precautionary Principle into public health necessitates revised methods for causal inference.
    • Articulating minimum evidentiary requirements is crucial for the effective application of the Precautionary Principle.
    • Further research is needed to understand the efficacy of proposed changes to causal inference methods.