Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response programming and reaction time.

M R Sheridan1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Hull, UK.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|September 1, 1981
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers investigated how previewing movement parameters affects reaction time. A "no-preview" design, unlike typical "preview" methods, better reveals how task demands influence reaction time by reflecting programming difficulty.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of s-R compatibility and task difficulty on unimaimual movement time.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

A reappraisal of fitts' law.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Otosclerosis.

The Medical press·2010
Same author

Movement variability and bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease.

Brain : a journal of neurology·1990
Same author

Programming and execution of movement in Parkinson's disease.

Brain : a journal of neurology·1987
Same journal

Preferential Cup Size and End-State Comfort in Children.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Previous studies often allowed participants to preview movement parameters before responding.
  • This previewing may confound results by enabling pre-programming of movements, obscuring true reaction time (RT) effects.
  • Confusion in the literature hinders understanding the relationship between RT and motor task complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the impact of previewing movement parameters on reaction time.
  • To determine if a "no-preview" design is more effective for studying RT and motor task demands.
  • To investigate whether observed RT variations reflect genuine programming difficulty.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment I employed a "no-preview" model, concealing movement parameters before response.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment II used the conventional "preview" model for comparison.
  • A third experiment further validated the findings.

    • Main Results:

    • The "no-preview" design (Experiment I) demonstrated a clearer relationship between reaction time and task parameters.
    • Observed effects on reaction time in the "no-preview" condition were attributed to programming difficulty.
    • Results indicated that previewing movement parameters complicates the interpretation of reaction time data.

    Conclusions:

    • The "no-preview" experimental design is superior for accurately measuring reaction time changes related to motor task demands.
    • Reaction time variations are significantly influenced by the cognitive processes involved in movement programming.
    • Future research on reaction time and motor control should adopt "no-preview" methodologies for clearer insights.