Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of daytime sleepiness.

H Moldofsky1

  • 1University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Clinics in Chest Medicine
|September 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Differentiating normal tiredness from pathological sleepiness is crucial. Objective measures like the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) are vital for diagnosing sleep disorders, unlike subjective self-ratings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognosis in anorexia nervosa.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Sleep, cytokines and immune function.

Sleep medicine reviews·2004
Same author

Atlas, rules, and recording techniques for the scoring of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in human sleep.

Sleep medicine·2003
Same author

Insomnia and health problems in Canadians.

Sleep·2001
Same author

Seasonal symptom severity in patients with rheumatic diseases: a study of 1,424 patients.

The Journal of rheumatology·2001
Same author

Actigraphy and parental ratings of sleep in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Sleep·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Sleep Medicine
  • Diagnostic Methods

Background:

  • Tiredness has diverse causes, necessitating differentiation between normal circadian rhythm variations and pathological sleepiness.
  • Faulty sleep habits (scheduling, restriction, drugs) can cause sleepiness, often identifiable via sleep-wake diaries.
  • Subjective sleepiness assessments may not align with objective measures, particularly in conditions like sleep apnea.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of distinguishing normal sleepiness from pathological sleepiness.
  • To compare subjective and objective methods for assessing sleepiness.
  • To evaluate the utility of various diagnostic tools for sleep disorders.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized sleep-wake diaries for habit-related sleepiness.
  • Employed subjective sleepiness scales (e.g., visual analogue scale, Stanford Sleepiness Scale - SSS).
  • Incorporated objective physiological measures like the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT).
  • Mentioned less common neurophysiologic methods (pupillometry, averaged evoked potentials) and HLA typing for narcolepsy.

Main Results:

  • Subjective sleepiness ratings may not correlate with objective performance or physiological measures.
  • The MSLT is a key tool for detecting physiological sleepiness and evaluating treatment response.
  • The MWT assesses the ability to stay awake and can monitor treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness.
  • Observed discrepancies between behavioral and physiological measures indicate they capture different facets of sleepiness.
  • HLA typing (DR2, DQw1) aids in diagnosing narcolepsy-cataplexy but lacks specificity.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate evaluation of tiredness requires understanding its varied meanings and differentiating normal from pathological sleepiness.
  • Objective measures like MSLT are crucial for diagnosing and managing sleep disorders, complementing or surpassing subjective assessments.
  • While MWT is useful for treatment monitoring, MSLT is primary for sleepiness detection; behavioral and physiological measures offer complementary insights.

Related Experiment Videos