Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Birthweight-adjusted Dubowitz methods: reducing misclassification of assessments of gestational age in a Zimbabwean
S A Feresu1, S D Harlow, B W Gillespie
1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. sferesu@umich.edu
Objective:
To evaluate the performance and the utility of using birthweight-adjusted scores of the Dubowitz method of estimating gestational age in a Zimbabwean population.
Design:
A validation study.
Setting:
Harare Maternity Hospital, from October to December 1999.
Subjects:
364 African newborn infants with a known last menstrual period (LMP), within the first 56 hours of life.
Main Outcome Measures:
Differences between regression lines and variances explained by Dubowitz scores obtained by examining newborn infants compared to gestational age calculated from the last menstrual period, in models with and without the addition of birthweight.
Results:
The Dubowitz method was a good predictor of gestational age, useful in differentiating term from pre-term infants. The beta coefficients from regression lines with and without addition of birthweight differed significantly from each other (z = 2.83, p < 0.01). Our regression line without adding birthweight was Y(LMP gestational age) = 23.814 + 0.301* score. Addition of birthweight to the regression models improved prediction of gestational age, Y(LMP gestational age) = 23.512 + 0.219* score + 0.0015* grams, and accounted for 69% of the variance compared to 66% in models without birthweight.
Conclusion:
The introduction of birthweight improves estimation of gestational age, correcting for the overestimation reported for the original Dubowitz methods and the error caused by low birthweight. We recommend the use of our birthweight-adjusted Dubowitz maturity scales for studies of prematurity, and for routine clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Regression Toward the Mean
Introduction to z Scores
z scores help...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
