Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Autonomy, guardianship and mental disorder: one problem, two solutions.

Genevra Richardson1

  • 1Queen Mary, University of London, UK.

The Modern Law Review
|June 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary

UK law struggles with patient autonomy for adults lacking capacity and those with mental disorders. Inconsistencies in consent and refusal rights create ethical challenges, requiring urgent legal reform.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The social underpinnings of mental distress in the time of COVID-19 - time for urgent action.

Wellcome open research·2020
Same author

The right to live independently and be included in the community.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2020
Same author

Decision-making capacity for treatment in psychiatric and medical in-patients: cross-sectional, comparative study.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2013
Same author

Mired in confusion: making sense of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

Medicine, science, and the law·2011
Same author

Publishing SNP genotypes of human embryonic stem cell lines: policy statement of the International Stem Cell Forum Ethics Working Party.

Stem cell reviews and reports·2011
Same author

Mentally disordered or lacking capacity? Lessons for management of serious deliberate self harm.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2010

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Mental Health Law

Background:

  • Current UK law presents challenges to patient autonomy for adults with incapacity and mental disorders.
  • Adults lacking capacity cannot consent or refuse treatment, with no legal framework for substitute decision-making.
  • Individuals with mental disorders can be treated against their competent refusal, creating legal inconsistencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the inconsistencies in UK law regarding medical treatment for adults with incapacity and mental disorder.
  • To analyze the implications of singling out mental disorder in legal provisions.
  • To evaluate current reform proposals for the Mental Health Act in light of these issues.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative legal analysis of statutes in England and Wales.
Keywords:
Legal ApproachMental Health Act 1983 (Great Britain)Mental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of case law and legal principles related to patient autonomy.
  • Review of Australian jurisdictions' approaches to substitute decision-making and mental health treatment.
  • Analysis of proposed reforms to the Mental Health Act.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant conflict identified between laws governing adults with incapacity and those with mental disorders concerning treatment consent and refusal.
    • The legal framework fails to adequately protect the autonomy of adults lacking capacity.
    • The distinct legal treatment of mental disorder raises concerns about discrimination and ethical practice.

    Conclusions:

    • The current legal landscape in England and Wales undermines patient autonomy, particularly for vulnerable groups.
    • There is a pressing need for legal reform to ensure consistent and ethical treatment provision.
    • Reforms should address the specific challenges posed by mental disorder and establish clear pathways for substitute decision-making.