Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing dynamic causal models.

W D Penny1, K E Stephan, A Mechelli

  • 1Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. w.penny@fil.ion.ucl.acl.uk

Neuroimage
|June 29, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

Core beliefs in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Neurofind: using deep learning to make individualised inferences in brain-based disorders.

Translational psychiatry·2025
Same author

Multivariate brain-behaviour associations in psychiatric disorders.

Translational psychiatry·2024
Same author

Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023
Same author

The association between psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, social withdrawal and psychosis relapse: a systematic review.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023
Same journal

Category-selective neural decreases in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex as defined with intracranial recordings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

EEG-Based Brain Fingerprints Elicited by Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

The Association between Brain Oscillatory Activity and Immediate Memory under Different Magnetoencephalography Paradigms: A population-based Study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Brain response to awe experiences in virtual reality: an integrated linear and nonlinear EEG analysis.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Convergent imaging and genetic signatures of gray matter atrophy in Parkinson's disease.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

What actually matters in multi-compartment EEG head models: A controlled FEM study of parcellation granularity, skull layering, mesh quality, noise, and inverse solver.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Bayes factors offer a robust method for comparing dynamic causal models (DCMs) used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis. This approach aids in evaluating competing hypotheses about neural network architecture and interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Brain Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Dynamic Causal Models (DCMs) infer effective connectivity from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data.
  • Model structure assumptions, particularly regarding human brain anatomical connectivity, introduce significant degrees of freedom.
  • Evaluating competing hypotheses about neural connections and their modulation is crucial but lacks formal procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the application of Bayes factors for comparing Dynamic Causal Models (DCMs).
  • To guide model structure selection for both intrinsic connectivity and contextual modulation.
  • To provide a formal framework for evaluating competing scientific theories of neural networks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Bayes factors as a statistical tool for model comparison within the DCM framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied Bayes factors to assess intrinsic connectivity patterns and the modulation of connections by experimental factors.
  • Integrated Bayes factors with DCM to rigorously compare different hypotheses about neural architecture.

    • Main Results:

    • Bayes factors effectively guide choices in defining DCM structure, addressing intrinsic connectivity.
    • The method facilitates the evaluation of how experimental manipulations modulate specific neural connections.
    • Demonstrated a formal procedure for comparing competing hypotheses regarding neural network connectivity.

    Conclusions:

    • The combined use of Bayes factors and DCMs enables robust evaluation of scientific theories on neural network architecture.
    • This approach enhances the inferential power of fMRI data analysis for understanding perception and cognition.
    • Provides a principled way to select between competing models of effective connectivity in the brain.