Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Naming and grasping common objects: a priming study.

Camelia Garofeanu1, Grzegorz Króliczak, Melvyn A Goodale

  • 1Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, CIHR Group on Action and Perception, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5C2, Canada.

Experimental Brain Research
|June 29, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking past and present worlds in the visual control of behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

A new framework for facial age estimation in humans and AIs.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Online corrections to visual targets are not a distinct class of movement.

iScience·2026
Same author

Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing.

iScience·2025
Same author

Rapid integration of face detection and task set in visually guided reaching.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

The contribution of semantic distance knowledge to size constancy in perception and grasping when visual cues are limited.

Neuropsychologia·2024

Priming object naming speeds up response times, but priming object grasping does not. Memory-dependent perceptual processing significantly impacts naming, unlike moment-to-moment visuomotor computations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Object recognition involves both perceptual and visuomotor processing.
  • Priming paradigms are used to study implicit memory and cognitive processing.
  • Understanding how different processing types affect object interaction is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of repetition priming on object naming and grasping.
  • To determine if naming or grasping is more susceptible to priming effects.
  • To examine the influence of perceptual and visuomotor study tasks on subsequent object naming.

Main Methods:

  • A repetition-priming paradigm was employed with common objects.
  • Participants engaged in tasks such as naming, grasping, orientation matching, and discrimination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response latency was measured to assess priming effects across different experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Strong priming effects (decreased latency) were observed when naming followed naming or grasping.
    • No priming effects were found when grasping followed naming or grasping.
    • Priming of naming was significant across all study conditions, with greater effects following more perceptual tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Object naming relies more heavily on memory-dependent perceptual/semantic processing than object grasping.
    • Object grasping appears to depend more on immediate, moment-to-moment visuomotor computations.
    • These findings differentiate the cognitive mechanisms underlying object naming versus object grasping.