Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
Screening coagulation tests in the cat: reference values based on direct venipuncture and catheterized samples
C R Killingsworth1, D J Weiss, G E Eyster
1Departments of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Pathology, and Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Insights
This study compared coagulation test results in pet cats versus laboratory cats. Fibrinogen levels were significantly different between the groups, but other common coagulation parameters showed no significant variation.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Hematology
- Comparative Coagulation Studies in Feline Models
Background:
- Establishing reference ranges for coagulation parameters in healthy cats is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment.
- Understanding potential variations in these parameters based on sample collection methods and cat populations (pet vs. laboratory) is important for clinical interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine and compare key hemostatic parameters in healthy pet cats and laboratory-conditioned cats.
- To assess if sample collection method (venipuncture vs. jugular catheter) influences coagulation test results.
Main Methods:
- Collected blood samples from 46 healthy adult cats (20 pet, 26 laboratory-conditioned).
- Measured platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen degradation products (FDPs), fibrinogen, and modified thrombin time (MTT).
- Analyzed data using Student's t-test to compare results between the two groups.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant difference (p <.05) was observed in fibrinogen levels between pet cats and laboratory-conditioned cats.
- No significant differences were detected in platelet count, PT, aPTT, FDPs, or MTT between the two groups.
- Data for all parameters were tabulated with range, mean, standard error, and 95% confidence intervals.
Conclusions:
- Fibrinogen levels may differ between pet and laboratory-conditioned cats, potentially due to factors related to their environment or handling.
- Common coagulation parameters like PT, aPTT, and platelet counts appear consistent across these two cat populations when using standard collection methods.
- Further research is warranted to explore the reasons behind fibrinogen variations and to establish comprehensive feline coagulation reference ranges.
Abstract:
Platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen degradation products, fibrinogen, and modified thrombin time were determined in 46 healthy adult cats. Samples were obtained by direct venipuncture (pet cats, n=20) or through an 18 gauge intravenous jugular catheter (laboratory conditioned cats, n=26). Range, mean, standard error, and 95% confidence interval were tabulated for the 2 samples. A statistically significant difference between the two groups of cats (Student's t test, p <.05) was found for fibrinogen. No statistical difference was detected between the two groups of cats for the other laboratory values.

