Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Understanding pretrial publicity: predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors
Lorraine Hope1, Amina Memon, Peter McGeorge
1School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, Scotland. l.hope@abdn.ac.uk
Abstract:
Prejudicial pretrial publicity (PTP) constitutes a serious source of juror bias. The current study examined differences in predecisional distortion for mock jurors exposed to negative PTP (N-PTP) versus nonexposed control participants. According to work by K. A. Carlson and J. E. Russo (2001), predecisional distortion occurs when jurors bias new evidence in favor of their current leading party (prosecution or defense) rather than evaluating this information for its actual probative properties. Jury-eligible university students (N=116) acted as jurors in a mock trial. Elevated rates of guilty verdicts were observed in the N-PTP condition. Predecisional distortion scores were significantly higher in the N-PTP condition and reflected a proprosecution bias. The effect of prejudicial PTP on verdict outcomes was mediated by predecisional distortion in the evaluation of testimony. Results are discussed in relation to motivated decision making and confirmation biases.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
First Impression
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Hindsight Biases
Confirmation Biases
Framing Effects

