Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
The impact of population heterogeneity on risk estimation in genetic counseling
Wenlei Liu1, Nikolina Icitovic, Michele L Shaffer
1Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, A210, Suite 2200, 600 Centerview Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. wliu@hes.hmc.psu.edu
Background:
Genetic counseling has been an important tool for evaluating and communicating disease susceptibility for decades, and it has been applied to predict risks for a wide class of hereditary disorders. Most diseases are complex in nature and are affected by multiple genes and environmental conditions; it is highly likely that DNA tests alone do not define all the genetic factors responsible for a disease, so that persons classified into the same risk group by DNA testing actually could have different disease susceptibilities. Ignorance of population heterogeneity may lead to biased risk estimates, whereas additional information on population heterogeneity may improve the precision of such estimates.
Methods:
Although DNA tests are widely used, few studies have investigated the accuracy of the predicted risks. We examined the impact of population heterogeneity on predicted disease risks by simulation of three different heterogeneity scenarios and studied the precision and accuracy of the risks estimated from a logistic regression model that ignored population heterogeneity. Moreover, we also incorporated information about population heterogeneity into our original model and investigated the resulting improvement in the accuracy of risk estimation.
Results:
We found that heterogeneity in one or more categories could lead to biased estimates not only in the "contaminated" categories but also in other homogeneous categories. Incorporating information about population heterogeneity into the original model greatly improved the accuracy of risk estimation.
Conclusions:
Our findings imply that without thorough knowledge about genetic basis of the disease, risks estimated from DNA tests may be misleading. Caution should be taken when evaluating the predicted risks obtained from genetic counseling. On the other hand, the improved accuracy of risk estimates after incorporating population heterogeneity information into the model did point out a promising direction for genetic counseling, since more and more new techniques are being invented and disease etiology is being better understood.
Related Concept Videos
What is Population Genetics?
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles, which...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Genetic Drift