Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ten myths about decision-making capacity.

Linda Ganzini1, Ladislav Volicer, William A Nelson

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
|July 2, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Understanding patient decision-making capacity is crucial for ethical healthcare. This article debunks 10 common myths clinicians hold about assessing capacity, aiming to improve patient autonomy in healthcare choices.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'The Play's the Thing' Among Other Innovations: The Establishment of the Medical College of Wisconsin's Medical Humanities Program and Its Incorporation of Medical Humanities Into Medical Education.

WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin·2026
Same author

The Implications of Private Equity Investment in Emergency Medicine.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2026
Same author

Generation cycles in experimental populations of a multivoltine insect.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Decades of historical outbreak cycles in a multivoltine insect reveal a plastic phenological response to climate change.

Ecology·2025
Same author

Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.

PLOS digital health·2025
Same author

Should physicians be facilitating gestational carrier arrangements in the absence of medical indication?

Fertility and sterility·2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Patient role in healthcare decisions hinges on clinician assessment of decision-making capacity.
  • Accurate capacity assessment is an ethical obligation for clinicians.
  • Misconceptions about capacity can lead to errors in clinical judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide clinicians with practical information on decision-making capacity.
  • To identify and debunk common myths regarding decision-making capacity assessment.
  • To prevent errors in capacity assessment and support patient rights.

Main Methods:

  • Based on a report by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
  • Incorporated findings from a study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified and analyzed 10 prevalent myths about decision-making capacity.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinicians hold significant misconceptions about decision-making capacity.
    • Common myths include equating capacity with competency, assuming incapacity when patients refuse advice, viewing capacity as absolute, and linking it directly to cognitive impairment or specific diagnoses.
    • The assessment of decision-making capacity is often misunderstood regarding its permanence and who can perform it.

    Conclusions:

    • Debunking myths about decision-making capacity is essential for accurate clinical assessment.
    • Correcting these misconceptions supports patients' fundamental right to make informed healthcare choices.
    • Promoting a clear understanding of capacity assessment enhances ethical medical practice.