Fluoroscopic placement of jejunal feeding tubes
F Hoffer1, R H Sandler, L C Kaplan
1Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Insights
Fluoroscopically placed jejunal feeding tubes, including nasal (NJ) and gastrostomy (GJ) routes, show a high success rate in pediatric patients. Despite limited dwell times, these tubes remain valuable for nutritional support.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Jejunal feeding tubes are crucial for pediatric nutritional support.
- Nasal (NJ) and gastrostomy (GJ) routes are common placement methods.
- Fluoroscopic guidance is frequently used for accurate placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of fluoroscopically guided jejunal tube placements in children.
- To compare the retention time and fluoroscopic exposure between NJ and GJ tubes.
- To assess the continued role of these devices in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 50 pediatric patients undergoing jejunal tube placement over 2.5 years.
- Placements were either via nasal route (NJ) or existing gastrostomy site (GJ).
- Success rates, tube dwell times, and fluoroscopic times were recorded.
Main Results:
- A high success rate of 98% was achieved across 169 attempted placements.
- Nasal NJ tubes had an average dwell time of 13 days; gastrostomy GJ tubes averaged 37 days.
- Average fluoroscopic time was 6 minutes for NJ and 8 minutes for GJ placements.
Conclusions:
- Fluoroscopically guided jejunal tube placement is a successful and valuable technique in pediatric care.
- While retention times vary, both NJ and GJ tubes play an active role in nutritional management.
- These methods remain relevant despite limitations and alternative feeding strategies.
Abstract:
Over a two-and-one-half year period, 50 children underwent placements of jejunal tubes through a nasal route (NJ, n = 47) or through an existing gastrostomy site (GJ, n = 119). There were four attempted placements (98% success rate). The NJ tubes remained in place an average of 13 days, and the GJ tubes remained in place an average of 37 days. Fluoroscopic time for placement of an NJ tube averaged 6 min (29 cases), and for a GJ tube 8 minutes (91 cases). In spite of the limited retention time, fluoroscopic time, and availability of alternative methods, fluoroscopically placed jejunal feeding tubes are still playing an active role in this institution.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...


