Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Autonomic Function Following Concussion in Youth Athletes: An Exploration of Heart Rate Variability Using 24-hour Recording Methodology
Published on: September 21, 2018
Prognostic value of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction
Serban Balanescu1, Alexandru Dan Corlan, Maria Dorobantu
1Cardiology Department, Bucharest Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. smbala99@hotmail.com
Insights
Heart rate variability (HRV) effectively predicts mortality one year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), even with modern reperfusion therapies. Lower HRV indicates higher risk, independent of other factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Autonomic Nervous System Research
- Medical Prognostics
Background:
- Prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be influenced by autonomic dysfunction, assessed via heart rate variability (HRV).
- Previous studies on HRV's predictive value predated widespread reperfusion therapy for AMI.
- This study evaluates HRV parameters one year post-AMI in patients treated conventionally versus with reperfusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic value of heart rate variability (HRV) parameters one year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- To determine if HRV retains prognostic utility in patients treated with reperfusion therapy.
- To identify HRV parameters that independently predict mortality post-AMI.
Main Methods:
- Included 463 AMI patients (60.6±13.0 years); 211 received reperfusion (thrombolysis/PTCA), 251 conventional therapy.
- Calculated time-domain (SDNN, rMSSD) and frequency-domain (LF, HF, total power) HRV from 24-hour Holter ECGs 10-20 days post-AMI.
- Primary endpoint: one-year total mortality and sudden cardiac death.
Main Results:
- Cardiac death incidence was 14.7%, sudden death 4.8%, both higher in conventionally treated patients.
- Reperfusion patients showed higher HRV parameters (SDNN, total power, rMSSD, HF power) than conventional.
- Independent predictors of 1-year survival: SDNN<50 msec, rMSSD<20 msec, LF/HF>2, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, LVEF<40%.
Conclusions:
- HRV parameters are valuable prognostic indicators one year post-AMI, independent of LVEF and arrhythmias.
- Reperfusion therapy reduces mortality risk but does not diminish the prognostic utility of HRV.
- HRV assessment remains crucial for risk stratification after AMI, regardless of treatment strategy.
Background:
Prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be influenced by autonomic dysfunction that can be evaluated by assessment of heart rate variability (HRV). Its predictive value resulted from studies performed prior to large scale use of reperfusion therapy. We assessed the prognostic value of HRV parameters 1 year after AMI in patients treated conventionally or by a reperfusion method in the first 12 hours from onset.
Material/Methods:
We included 463 consecutive patients with AMI (312 M, 151 F) 60.6+/-13.0 years old. 211 were treated by thrombolysis or primary PTCA, the other 251 patients receiving conventional therapy. Time-domain (SDNN, rMSSD) and frequency-domain (LF, HF, total power) HRV parameters were calculated from 24-hour Holter ECG recordings 10-20 days after AMI. The primary endpoint was one-year total mortality and sudden cardiac death.
Results:
The incidence of cardiac death was 14.7%, while that of sudden death was 4.8%. Both were higher in patients treated conventionally. Patients treated by reperfusion had higher HRV parameters reflecting both vagal and sympathetic activity (SDNN, total spectral power) as well as those expressing only vagal output (rMSSD, HF power) than conventionally treated subjects. The variables independently correlating with 1-year survival were SDNN<50 msec, rMSSD<20 msec, LF/HF>2, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and left ventricular ejection fraction <40%.
Conclusions:
HRV parameters have prognostic value independent from left ventricular ejection fraction and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias one year after AMI. Reduction of mortality risk by reperfusion therapy does not decrease the prognostic utility of HRV after AMI.
More Related Videos
08:12Calculating Heart Rate Variability from ECG Data from Youth with Cerebral Palsy During Active Video Game Sessions
Published on: June 5, 2019
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies