Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Neurologic complications of petrosal sinus sampling
D L Miller1, J L Doppman, S B Peterman
1Diagnostic Radiology Department, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract:
Petrosal sinus sampling has been described as an innocuous, essentially risk-free procedure. The authors report on two patients from two different institutions who sustained brain stem injury as a result of petrosal sinus sampling and two other patients in whom brain stem injury was avoided. Major neurologic complications have occurred in only 0.2% of procedures (one of 508) performed at the National Institutes of Health and in 0.5% of a subset of these procedures (one of 184) that were performed with a specially designed petrosal sinus catheter. The cause of these complications is unclear but is presumed to be localized venous hypertension. Tip-deflector catheter-guide-wire systems, if available, are recommended for petrosal sinus sampling. Inadequate data exist to permit recommendation of any other catheter. Brain stem injury is preventable if the catheter is withdrawn at the earliest sign of even a minor, seemingly insignificant problem. Subtle symptoms and signs that may not appear to be neurologic may herald a clinical catastrophe if not heeded.
Insights
Petrosal sinus sampling, though generally safe, can cause brain stem injury. Early detection of subtle symptoms and prompt catheter withdrawal can prevent serious neurologic complications.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Radiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Petrosal sinus sampling is a diagnostic procedure often considered low-risk.
- The procedure involves accessing the petrosal sinuses, typically for hormonal assessment.
Observation:
- Two cases of brain stem injury following petrosal sinus sampling are reported.
- Two additional cases where brain stem injury was successfully avoided are also presented.
- Major neurologic complications occurred in 0.2% of 508 procedures at NIH, and 0.5% with a specialized catheter.
Findings:
- The exact cause of brain stem injury is unknown but suspected to be localized venous hypertension.
- Tip-deflector catheter-guide-wire systems are recommended for petrosal sinus sampling.
- No other catheter type can be definitively recommended due to insufficient data.
Implications:
- Brain stem injury during petrosal sinus sampling is preventable.
- Prompt catheter withdrawal upon the earliest sign of any issue, even subtle, is crucial.
- Subtle or seemingly non-neurologic symptoms may precede severe clinical events and must be heeded.
More Related Videos
06:48Ethanol-Induced Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion Block Applications for Promoting Canine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Regeneration Using an Artificial Nerve
Published on: November 30, 2018
14:53Intra-Arterial Delivery of Neural Stem Cells to the Rat and Mouse Brain: Application to Cerebral Ischemia
Published on: June 26, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization