Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Dosimetric impact of prostate volume change between CT-based HDR brachytherapy fractions
Yongbok Kim1, I-Chow Hsu, Etienne Lessard
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, Suite H-1031, San Francisco, CA 94143-1708, USA. kim@radionc17.ucsf.edu
Purpose:
The objective is to evaluate the prostate volume change and its dosimetric consequences after the insertion of catheters for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Methods And Materials:
For 13 consecutive patients, a spiral CT scan was acquired before each of the 2 fractions, separated on average by 20 hours. The coordinates of the catheters were obtained on 3 axial CT slices corresponding to apex, mid portion, and base portion of the prostate. A mathematical expansion model was used to evaluate the change of prostate volumes between the 2 fractions. It is based on the difference in the cube of the average distance between the centroid and catheter positions. The variation of implant dose-volume histograms between fractions was computed for plans produced by either inverse planning based on simulated annealing or geometric optimization.
Results:
The average magnitude of either increase or reduction in prostate volume was 7.8% (range, 2-17%). This volume change corresponds to an average prostate radius change of only 2.5% (range, 0.7-5.4%). For 5 patients, the prostate volume increased on average by 9% (range, 2-17%), whereas a reduction was observed for 8 patients by an average of 7% (range, 2-13%). More variation was observed at the prostate base than at mid or apex gland. The comparison of implant dose-volume histograms showed a small reduction of V100 receiving the prescription dose, with an average of 3.5% (range, 0.5-12%) and 2.2% (range, 1-6%) for inverse planning based on our simulated annealing and geometric optimization plans, respectively.
Conclusion:
Small volume change was observed between treatment fractions. This translates into small changes in dose delivered to the prostate volume.
