Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory.

Amy H Criss1, Richard M Shiffrin

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. acriss@indiana.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Dialogues about the practice of science.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Modeling collaborative memory with SAM.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Validation of a rodent model of episodic memory replay.

Learning & behavior·2024
Same author

Function estimation: Quantifying individual differences of hand-drawn functions.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Recognition memory decisions made with short- and long-term retrieval.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The word frequency effect in memory is reduced when specific study tasks are used. This suggests that how information is encoded influences memory performance for low-frequency words.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • The word frequency effect in episodic recognition memory typically shows low-frequency words (LF) having higher hit rates (HR) and lower false alarm rates (FAR) than high-frequency words (HF), known as the mirror pattern.
  • Prior research suggests that specific study tasks or varying study times might alter this mirror pattern, particularly the LF-HR advantage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how study time and study task interact to influence the word frequency effect in recognition memory.
  • To test theoretical explanations based on the encoding of distinctive features.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted 5 experiments manipulating study time and the nature of the study task.
  • Assessed recognition memory performance (HR and FAR) for low-frequency and high-frequency words under different encoding conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The complete mirror pattern was observed only under standard study conditions and a specific task involving judgments about unusual letters.
  • The LF-HR advantage was diminished or eliminated in certain experimental conditions, while the LF-FAR effect remained largely unaffected.

Conclusions:

  • The encoding of distinctive features plays a crucial role in modulating the word frequency effect in recognition memory.
  • Findings have implications for understanding current theories of recognition memory and the word frequency effect, highlighting the importance of encoding specificity.