Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Techniques for Investigating the Anatomy of the Ant Visual System
Published on: November 27, 2017
Nest architecture and genetic differentiation in a species complex of Australian stingless bees
1Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CS30016, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34988 Montferrier Cedex, France. pfranck@avignon.inra.fr
Abstract:
We investigated the taxonomic significance of nest shape and its putative role in speciation in Trigona (Heterotrigona) carbonaria and T. (H.) hockingsi, two sibling species of stingless bee species from eastern Australia. These species are primarily distinguished by their nest architecture, as in all other respects they are nearly identical. We genotyped 130 colonies from six locations in Queensland at 13 microsatellite loci together with 106 additional colonies from six other Indo-Pacific Trigona species. Whether they were present in allopatry or in sympatry, colonies that displayed the T. carbonaria or the T. hockingsi nest architecture could be unambiguously differentiated at the genetic level. However, T. hockingsi colonies were classifiable into two highly differentiated paraphyletic and geographically separate populations, one in northern and one in southern Queensland. These two populations probably belong to two distinct species, T. hockingsi and T. davenporti nov. sp. Our results suggest that nest architecture characters are relevant but not sufficient criteria to identify species in this group. Consequently, modifications of nest architecture are probably not of prime importance in the speciation process of Australian stingless bees, although nest architecture differences probably result from relatively simple mechanisms. The rare interspecific hybrid colonies detected did not display a nest with an intermediate form between T. hockingsi and T. carbonaria.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Species and Reproductive Barriers
Formation of Species
Pollination and Flower Structure
Genetics of Speciation
Gene Flow
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

