Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Graphical models for causation, and the identification problem.

David A Freedman1

  • 1University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Evaluation Review
|July 13, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immune Factor, TNFα, Disrupts Human Brain Organoid Development Similar to Schizophrenia-Schizophrenia Increases Developmental Vulnerability to TNFα.

Frontiers in cellular neuroscience·2020
Same author

Weighting regressions by propensity scores.

Evaluation review·2008
Same author

Statistical models for causation: what inferential leverage do they provide?

Evaluation review·2006
Same author

Invited commentary: how far can epidemiologists get with statistical adjustment?

American journal of epidemiology·2005
Same author

On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer.

International journal of epidemiology·2004
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

Graphical models offer a framework for causal inference, but inferring causality from data requires substantial prior knowledge of data-generating mechanisms. Causal relationships are not directly derivable from regressions alone.

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Graphical models
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Traditional causal inference often relies heavily on counterfactuals.
  • The role of error distributions in causal inference is critical but complex.
  • Connecting mathematical frameworks to real-world causality requires clear interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish graphical models for causation with fewer counterfactuals.
  • To explore the interpretation of graphical models using conditional distributions.
  • To address the identification problem in causal inference.

Main Methods:

  • Development of graphical models for representing causal relationships.
  • Interpretation of graphs using conditional distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of the identification problem in terms of conditional probabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • Causal relationships cannot be inferred from data solely through regression analysis without prior knowledge.
    • The invariance of error distributions is important, but errors themselves do not need to be invariant.
    • Successful applications of graphical models are limited due to the difficulty in excluding causal pathways a priori.

    Conclusions:

    • Graphical models provide a framework for causation, but their practical application in inferring causality from data is constrained.
    • Substantial prior knowledge of data-generating mechanisms is essential for valid causal inference.
    • The assessment of invariance conditions remains an open area for investigation.