Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Longitudinal craving profiles in cannabis use disorder: A latent class growth analysis of the achieving cannabis cessation: Evaluating N-Acetylcysteine Treatment (ACCENT) (CTN-0053) trial.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026

Same author

Effect of HIV on bedaquiline and delamanid pharmacokinetics in patients with multidrug-resistant TB.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2026

Same author

From traditional Chinese medicine to molecular oncology - pleiotropic effects of tauroursodeoxycholic acid.

Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti·2025

Same author

The endoplasmic reticulum and its signaling pathways - a novel target for multiple myeloma treatment.

Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti·2023

Same author

Suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in an urban post-partum maternity setting: a retrospective cohort study.

Irish journal of psychological medicine·2023

Same author

Quality of three muscles from suckler bulls finished on concentrates and slaughtered at 16 months of age or slaughtered at 19 months of age from two production systems.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

An empirically-derived clinical placement evaluation tool: a 3-country study.

L G Moseley¹, D M Mead, L Moran

¹School of Care Sciences, Glyntaff Campus, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK. lgmoseley@aol.com

Nurse Education Today

|July 13, 2004

Summary

A new clinical placement evaluation scale offers reliable scores with strong empirical backing. This brief tool shows consistent results across the UK, Finland, and Germany, improving medical education assessment.

More Related Videos

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Psychometrics

Background:

Clinical placements are crucial for medical training.
Existing evaluation tools often lack reliability or empirical validation.
A need exists for a brief, dependable assessment method.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a brief clinical placement evaluation scale.
To ensure the scale provides reliable numerical scores.
To assess the scale's cross-cultural validity in European settings.

Main Methods:

Development of a novel, concise evaluation instrument.
Empirical validation of the scale's scoring reliability.
Cross-national correlation analysis of scores from the UK, Finland, and Germany.

Main Results:

The developed scale is brief and simple to complete.
The scale yields reliable numerical scores with a strong empirical foundation.
Scores demonstrated good correlation across the three studied European countries.

Conclusions:

The new clinical placement evaluation scale is a valid and reliable tool.
Its cross-cultural consistency supports its use in diverse European medical education contexts.
This instrument addresses the need for a practical and empirically sound assessment.