Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effects of pooling mRNA in microarray class comparisons.

Joanna H Shih1, Aleksandra M Michalowska, Kevin Dobbin

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. jshih@mail.nih.gov <jshih@mail.nih.gov>

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|July 13, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration patient questions for their eye care providers and preferences for education.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

A brief novel questionnaire to estimate premorbid functional state in acute stroke patients.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Metronomic chemotherapy of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a target trial emulation study.

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology·2025
Same author

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Prostate Biparametric MRI Interpretation: An International Multireader Study.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025
Same author

Dynamic Evolution of Vascular Features Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Pathological Response, Patterns of Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Hereditary and Sporadic Papillary Kidney Cancer.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KASSPer: Kinase Active Site Structure Prediction using Protein and Ligand Language Models and Its Application to Virtual Screening.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

IDR searcher: a search engine solution for public image resources.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KCFtools: Rapid alignment-free method for introgression screening and GWAS using k-mer profiles.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Meta2DB: Curated shotgun metagenomic feature sets and metadata for health state prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

conMItion: an R package adjusting confounding factors for associations in multi-omics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Pooling RNA samples in microarray experiments may not save costs. Increased subjects are needed for pooled designs to achieve similar power to non-pooled designs, and pooling assumptions may not hold true.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Microarray experiments often involve pooling RNA samples to address insufficient individual sample amounts or reduce costs.
  • The fundamental assumption of pooling is that gene expression in the pool accurately reflects the average individual expression.
  • Previous studies have not fully accounted for variation sources or addressed power and sample size in pooled microarray designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of RNA sample pooling on detecting differential gene expression in microarrays.
  • To evaluate the validity of the pooling assumption considering various sources of variation.
  • To provide formulas for sample size and power calculations in pooled versus non-pooled microarray designs.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulas for calculating required subjects and arrays for desired statistical power and significance level were derived.
  • The study analyzed data from both cDNA and Affymetrix GeneChip microarray platforms.
  • Statistical power and sample size implications of pooled versus non-pooled designs were assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • Pooled designs can lead to a loss of degrees of freedom, potentially requiring more subjects for comparable statistical power.
    • The increased cost of additional samples for pooled designs may negate the savings from using fewer microarrays.
    • Microarray data analysis indicated that the core assumption of pooling may not be consistently met across platforms.

    Conclusions:

    • RNA sample pooling in microarrays requires careful consideration of statistical power and sample size.
    • The potential cost savings from pooling may be offset by the need for more subjects to achieve adequate power.
    • Researchers should validate the pooling assumption using their specific experimental data before implementing pooled designs.