Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ambiguous figures: living versus nonliving objects.

Ilse M Verstijnen1, Johan Wagemans

  • 1Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B 3000 Leuven, Belgium. i.m.verstijnen@fss.uu.nl

Perception
|July 15, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Perceptual ambiguity studies reveal consistent biases in how people interpret visual information. Object type influences interpretation, with living objects favoring top-down processing and nonliving objects showing different biases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Navon: Different designs of local-global tasks capture different bias effects.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Tracing aesthetic experience from perception and conception to appraisal using deep convolutional neural networks.

iScience·2026
Same author

From pixels to perception: A benchmark for human-like symmetry detection.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Finding Closure: A Closer Look at the Gestalt Law of Closure in Convolutional Neural Networks.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Variability and predictability as key factors in a new approach to choreographic complexity in dance.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Rethinking neuroaesthetics: Toward a multidimensional and integrative science of aesthetic experience.

Neuron·2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Ambiguous figures are crucial for understanding visual perception.
  • Previous research has not fully explored biases in interpreting ambiguous stimuli.
  • Establishing normative data for ambiguous figures is essential for future studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify perceptual ambiguity levels across eleven figure series.
  • To investigate biases in interpreting ambiguous visual stimuli.
  • To provide normative data for ambiguous figures.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects viewed triplets of ambiguous and extreme figures.
  • Tasks involved comparing figures and indicating similarity via arrows or circling.
  • Experiments manipulated comparison direction and instructions to test for biases.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A consistent left-extreme preference was observed initially.
  • This preference shifted for nonliving objects, favoring the right extreme.
  • Biases persisted across different experimental conditions and response methods.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptual interpretation of ambiguous figures is subject to systematic biases.
  • Object type (living vs. nonliving) influences these biases.
  • Top-down processing may explain biases for living objects; bottom-up explanations were less supported.