Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating heterogeneity in cumulative meta-analyses.

Elmer V Villanueva1, Silva Zavarsek

  • 1Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. Elmer.Villanueva@nbcc.org.au

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|July 15, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Behavioral Responses to Healthcare Funding Decisions and Their Impact on Value for Money: Evidence From Australia.

Health economics·2025
Same author

Low Iodine Nutrition Knowledge in Chinese Breastfeeding Women despite Adequate Iodine Status.

Nutrients·2024
Same author

The use of breast milk iodine concentration in the first week of lactation as a biomarker of iodine status in breast-feeding women.

The British journal of nutrition·2023
Same author

Strengthening the presence of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices in the Medical Journal of Australia.

The Medical journal of Australia·2022
Same author

Rationale and design of the intravenous iron for treatment of anemia before cardiac surgery trial.

American heart journal·2021
Same author

Healthcare Funding Decisions and Real-World Benefits: Reducing Bias by Matching Untreated Patients.

PharmacoEconomics·2021

Cumulative meta-analysis reveals how heterogeneity evolves over time for smoking cessation interventions. This approach offers richer insights into intervention effectiveness than traditional methods.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Biostatistics
  • Public health

Background:

  • Established measures like I2 and H assess heterogeneity in conventional meta-analyses.
  • The development of heterogeneity within cumulative meta-analyses has not been previously studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the evolution of statistical heterogeneity in cumulative meta-analyses.
  • To explore how heterogeneity changes over time, by control event rate, and by sample size for smoking cessation interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Cumulative meta-analyses were performed on five smoking cessation interventions: clonidine, nicotine replacement therapy (gum and patch), physician advice, and acupuncture.
  • Heterogeneity measures (I2 and H) were calculated and plotted against publication year, control event rate, and sample size.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The evaluation of heterogeneity differed based on the specific measure and cumulation method used.
  • Graphical representations of heterogeneity revealed specific areas warranting further investigation into potential sources of variation.

Conclusions:

  • Analyzing heterogeneity alongside summary effect estimates in cumulative meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the progression of variation.
  • This method offers a more comprehensive understanding of intervention effectiveness compared to conventional meta-analyses.