Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision
Steven T Woolson1, Christopher S Mow, Jose Fernando Syquia
1Stanford University Hospital, Stanford, California, USA. stevewoolson@yahoo.com
Background:
Primary total hip replacement performed through an incision that is
Methods:
A consecutive series of patients who underwent 135 primary unilateral total hip replacements (fifty with use of a mini-incision [
Results:
With the numbers of patients available, no significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the average surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, in-hospital transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, or the patients' disposition after discharge. The mini-incision group was found to have a significantly higher risk of a wound complication (p = 0.02), a higher percentage of acetabular component malposition (p = 0.04), and poor fit and fill of femoral components inserted without cement (p = 0.0036).
Conclusions:
There was no evidence that the mini-incision technique resulted in less bleeding or less trauma to the soft tissues of the hip, factors that would have produced a quicker recovery and a shorter hospital stay, than did the standard technique. The present study, which was based on the authors' initial experience with the mini-incision technique, failed to confirm the positive clinical outcomes reported by previous uncontrolled cohort studies, and the findings suggest that further analysis of this new technique is needed before it can be recommended for general use.
