Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Computerized plastic surgery office.

Philip J Miller¹

¹Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA. drmiller@drphilipmiller.com

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery

|July 15, 2004

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Deformity, etiology, solution, sequence (DESS): Facial analysis in rhinoplasty.

American journal of otolaryngology·2023

Same author

Correction of the Nasal Ala.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2021

Same author

Management of Lip Complications.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2019

Same author

The bow-tie mattress suture for the correction of nasal cartilage convexities and concavities.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2010

Same author

Biomechanical analysis of anchoring points in rhytidectomy.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2010

Same author

Treatment of dorsal deviation.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2009

Same journal

Photon-counting detector computed tomography for temporal bone: does higher resolution matter?

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026

Same journal

Advances in patient-specific 3D-printed models in temporal bone surgery.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026

Same journal

Graduated autonomy in head and neck microvascular surgery fellowship training: oncologic and reconstructive competency, safety, and educational implications.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026

Same journal

Costs and system-wide considerations within head and neck reconstruction: moving toward a value-based care framework.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026

Same journal

Modern methods of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026

Same journal

Flap selection for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Facial plastic surgeons can enhance office efficiency by adopting new technologies like digital photography and wireless networking. This review guides physicians in selecting and integrating these tools to streamline practice management and improve patient care.

Area of Science:

Medical Technology
Facial Plastic Surgery
Office Management

Background:

Technological advancements, particularly in computing, are rapidly evolving.
Integrating new technologies into a facial plastic surgery practice presents a significant challenge for physicians.
Staying current with the latest technological capacities is essential for modern medical practices.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the most appropriate methods for incorporating new technologies into a facial plastic surgery office.
To identify and discuss the latest available technological tools relevant to facial plastic surgery practices.
To assist physicians in selecting and implementing technologies that enhance practice efficiency.

Main Methods:

Literature review of recent technological advancements.

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of emerging technologies applicable to medical office settings.

Synthesis of information on systems integration and digital tools.

Main Results:

Key technological developments include wireless networking, systems integration, digital photography/video, affordable computing, and personal digital assistant (PDA) integration.
These advancements offer significant benefits for busy facial plastic surgery offices.
Successful implementation can lead to streamlined operations and increased efficiency.

Conclusions:

Keeping pace with technological progress is challenging and can be overwhelming.
Selective adoption of technological tools can help physicians streamline office systems.
Integrating appropriate technologies is crucial for enhancing efficiency in facial plastic surgery practices.