Relationship of strain magnitude to morphological variation in the primate skull

In a comparative study of variation in primate skulls, Wood and Lieberman ([2001] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 116:13-25) proposed that a predictable relationship exists between in vivo bone-strain magnitudes and the extent of morphological variation in skeletal structures. They hypothesized that regions subject to high strains are prone to enhanced levels of variation. Three questions are posed with respect to the plausibility of this hypothesis. First, does the proposed relationship hold at different levels of analysis (e.g., for more restricted anatomical regions in which large strain gradients are present)? Second, is the biomechanical rationale for the hypothesis sound, given the current understanding of bone biology? Third, is the hypothesis obviated by consideration of the functional matrix concept of skull development, in which osseous growth is posited to be governed by surrounding soft tissues (e.g., muscle and tendon) and developing spaces (e.g., the nasal capsule)? The different perspectives explored by these questions suggest that the validity of the hypothesis, despite having a defensible theoretical rationale, is likely to be context-specific. A direct role for strain magnitude in conditioning morphological variation is difficult to demonstrate either comparatively or theoretically, and it is unlikely that a single strain threshold or interval can be directly associated with elevated variation in the skeleton. The conceptual framework of the functional matrix (which allows for independent growth among different regions of the skull) conceivably contravenes the premise of a uniform relationship of strain magnitude to morphological variability.