Reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

Marie Berg1, Reidun Jahnsen, Kathrine Frey Frøslie

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Statistics, National Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway. Marie.Berg@Sunnaas.no

Insights

The Norwegian Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) shows excellent reliability between the same raters and interviewers. However, consistency decreases when different respondents, like parents and teachers, provide information.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Disability Assessment

Background:

  • The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) is a key tool for assessing functional abilities in children with disabilities.
  • A Norwegian translation of the PEDI is now available, necessitating reliability testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the inter-rater, inter-respondent, and intra-rater reliability of the Norwegian version of the PEDI.
  • To establish the consistency of functional ability assessments in a Norwegian pediatric population.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved 30 typically developing Norwegian children aged 1.0–5.0 years.
  • Interviews were conducted by an occupational therapist (twice) and a physiotherapist (once) with parents.
  • Kindergarten teachers were also interviewed by the occupational therapist.

Main Results:

  • Excellent agreement was found for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.95–0.99).
  • Inter-respondent reliability between parents and teachers showed moderate agreement (ICC 0.64–0.74).

Conclusions:

  • High reliability is achieved when the same interviewer assesses the same respondent, or when two trained interviewers assess the same respondent.
  • Consistency in PEDI scores requires careful consideration of respondent differences and standardized training for administrators.