Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

O V Lungu1, T Wächter, T Liu

  • 1Brain Sciences Center, Minneapolis VAMC, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.

Experimental Brain Research
|July 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigation of liver-targeted peripheral focused ultrasound stimulation (pFUS) and its effect on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a proof of concept, phase 1 trial.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2023
Same author

Neural changes associated with appetite information processing in schizophrenic patients after 16 weeks of olanzapine treatment.

Translational psychiatry·2012
Same author

Inferior olive response to passive tactile and visual stimulation with variable interstimulus intervals.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2010
Same author

Specificity of inferior olive response to stimulus timing.

Journal of neurophysiology·2008
Same author

Neural substrates of intermanual transfer of a newly acquired motor skill.

Current biology : CB·2007
Same author

Selective impairments in implicit learning in Parkinson's disease.

Brain research·2007
Same journal

Effects of lumbar disc injury and nociception on trunk motor control during rat locomotion.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Motor learning utilizes probabilistic information, with detection occurring at stimulus-response (S-R) mapping and motor levels, but not perceptual ones. Different learning orders of frequencies and probabilities influence outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Implicit motor learning relies on detecting environmental patterns.
  • The mechanisms of probabilistic information use in perceptual-motor tasks are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how probabilistic information is detected and utilized in motor learning.
  • To determine the influence of probabilities at different levels (stimulus, response, S-R mapping) on motor learning.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments using a motor learning task with direct and crossed stimulus-response (S-R) mappings.
  • Probabilities were manipulated at stimulus set, response set, and S-R mapping levels, with single-level manipulation at a time.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Probabilities were detected at S-R mapping and motor levels, but not perceptual levels unless features overlapped.
  • Effects varied: facilitatory at S-R mapping, mixed at perceptual, inhibitory at response-set level.
  • Learning involved absolute frequencies then transitional probabilities (S-R mapping) or both simultaneously (perceptual).

Conclusions:

  • Motor learning uses both absolute frequencies and transitional probabilities, with temporal order depending on environmental properties.
  • Separate neural circuits may underlie the detection of absolute frequencies versus transitional probabilities.