Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Low accuracy of stem implantation in THR using the CASPAR-system: anteversion measurements in 10 hips
Farhad Mazoochian1, Christoph Pellengahr, Armin Huber
1Department of Orthopedics, University of Rostock, Germany. farhad.mazoochian@med.uni-rostock.de
Insights
Computer-assisted total hip replacement using the CASPAR-system showed significant deviations in implant positioning compared to preoperative plans. The study found inaccuracies in anteversion angles and translational deviations, questioning manufacturer claims of precision.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Medical device technology
- Radiological imaging
Background:
- Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) systems aim to improve surgical accuracy.
- The CASPAR-system is utilized for computer-assisted total hip replacement.
- Accurate implant positioning is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of implant positioning in total hip replacement using the CASPAR-system.
- To compare postoperative implant anteversion angles and translational deviations with preoperative surgical plans.
- To assess the reliability of the CASPAR-system in achieving precise stem placement.
Main Methods:
- Pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used for analysis.
- Ten patients undergoing computer-assisted total hip replacement with the CASPAR-system were studied.
- Quantitative measurements of stem anteversion and translational deviations were performed.
Main Results:
- An average difference of 7.8 degrees (SD 6.3) was found in anteversion angles.
- Average medial translational deviation was 1.8 mm (SD 1.7).
- Average lateral translational deviation was 1.2 mm (SD 1.4).
Conclusions:
- The study did not confirm the accuracy of implant positioning claimed by the CASPAR-system manufacturer.
- Significant deviations in stem anteversion and translational placement were observed.
- Further investigation into the precision of CAS systems in total hip replacement is warranted.
Abstract:
We studied 10 patients by means of pre- and postoperative CT who underwent computer-assisted total hip replacement using the CASPAR-system (OrthoMaquet GmbH, Rastatt, Germany). The anteversion angles of the stem and translational deviations measured after surgery were compared to the preoperatively planned ones as a quality control. We found an average difference of 7.8 degrees (SD 6.3 degrees; 95% CI 3.3 degrees-12.3 degrees) in the angles and an average difference of 1.8 (SD 1.7; 95% CI 0.6-3.0) mm and 1.2 (SD 1.4: 95% CI 0.25-2.2), respectively, in the medial and lateral deviation. In conclusion, we could not confirm the same accuracy of implant position as that claimed by the manufacturer.

