A randomized crossover comparative study of aspirin, cilostazol and clopidogrel in normal controls: analysis with

Joong-Seok Kim1, Kwang-Soo Lee, Yeong-In Kim

  • 1Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea.

Insights

Cilostazol effectively inhibits platelet aggregation, similar to aspirin and clopidogrel, but without prolonging bleeding time. This study highlights cilostazol

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Hematology
  • Clinical Medicine

Background:

  • Antiplatelet drugs are crucial in preventing thrombotic events.
  • Aspirin and clopidogrel are widely used but can increase bleeding risk.
  • Understanding the bleeding profiles of different antiplatelet agents is essential for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol on platelet aggregation and bleeding time.
  • To evaluate cilostazol's efficacy and safety profile relative to aspirin and clopidogrel.

Main Methods:

  • A quantitative bleeding time (QBT) test and platelet aggregation tests were conducted.
  • 12 healthy adult males participated, undergoing tests before and after a 7-day medication period.
  • The study assessed three antiplatelet drugs: aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol.

Main Results:

  • Cilostazol demonstrated effectiveness in inhibiting platelet aggregation, comparable to aspirin and clopidogrel.
  • Aspirin and clopidogrel significantly prolonged bleeding time after 7 days of administration.
  • Cilostazol treatment did not alter any measured QBT parameters, indicating no significant effect on bleeding time.

Conclusions:

  • Cilostazol exhibits potent antiplatelet aggregation efficacy.
  • Unlike aspirin and clopidogrel, cilostazol does not prolong bleeding time.
  • Cilostazol offers a potentially safer alternative for antiplatelet therapy by maintaining normal bleeding patterns.