Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Experimental context modulates warning signal effects.

W Machado-Pinheiro1, A J P Faria, L G Gawryszewski

  • 1Laboratório de Neurofisiologia do Comportamento, Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Instituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. walter@vm.uff.br

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research = Revista Brasileira De Pesquisas Medicas E Biologicas
|July 21, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Manual response latencies are affected by warning signals, with visual onsets causing delays in non-blocked contexts. This onset interference is eliminated in blocked contexts, suggesting attentional processing modulates warning effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interaction between affordance and handedness recognition: a chronometric study.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2015
Same author

Relative performance of the two hands in simple and choice reaction time tasks.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2013
Same author

Which factors are important for crossmodal attentional effect?

Experimental brain research·2013
Same author

Facilitatory effects of an auditory warning stimulus in a visual location identification task and a visual shape identification task.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2012
Same author

The Stroop matching task presents conflict at both the response and nonresponse levels: an event-related potential and electromyography study.

Psychophysiology·2012
Same author

Influence of cueing on the preparation and execution of untrained and trained complex motor responses.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2012
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human factors engineering

Background:

  • Saccadic eye movements, unlike manual responses, are known to be sensitive to warning signal types.
  • Visual onsets typically increase saccadic latencies compared to visual offsets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different warning signals on manual response latencies.
  • To test if onset interference occurs in manual responses.
  • To examine if contextual procedures modulate warning signal effects.

Main Methods:

  • Three warning signal conditions (visual onset, visual offset, auditory) were used across blocked and non-blocked contexts.
  • Eighteen participants performed a reaction time task with varying stimulus onset asynchronies.
  • Data were collected and analyzed across counterbalanced experimental sessions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visual onsets significantly increased manual latencies compared to visual offsets in a non-blocked context (275 ms vs. 261 ms).
  • This onset interference was observed only for short warning-stimulus intervals.
  • The interference effect was abolished in the blocked context (256 ms vs. 255 ms).

Conclusions:

  • Manual responses can exhibit onset interference, but it is context-dependent.
  • Attentional processing plays a crucial role in mitigating competitive interactions and distractor influences.
  • Top-down attentional mechanisms can override bottom-up stimulus-driven effects in warning signal paradigms.